Classic controversy
Crossfire debate examines hydrodistension for IC/BPS.
The Crossfire: Controversies in Urology debates remain one of the most anticipated features of the AUA Annual Meeting, bringing experts together to tackle some of the field's most challenging and divisive clinical questions.
This year, the spotlight turned to a number of issues, including hydrodistension for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Although current guidelines cite low-quality evidence supporting the procedure, panelists discussed where hydrodistension may still have a role, emphasizing careful patient selection, realistic expectations and balancing potential symptom relief against procedural risks. The discussion highlighted the importance of identifying patients with more bladder-centric disease and considering alternative therapies for those with significant chronic pain conditions or pelvic floor dysfunction.
For the complete story, read the full article here: Balancing risks and benefits of hydrodistension for IC/BPS.
