AUA
  • Program
  • Register
  • Meeting Coverage
  • Guidelines
  • Industry Highlights
  • Science & Technology Hall
Topics
  • Meeting Coverage
  • Guidelines
  • Industry Highlights
  • Science & Technology Hall
Resources
  • Program
  • Register
Twitter X icon Facebook iconInstagram iconYouTube iconLinkedIn icon
May 16, 2026

Break Wave challenges standard lithotripsy approach

Trial finds low-pressure ultrasound cleared 70% of stones without anesthesia or adverse events.


Ben H. Chew, MD, MSc
Ben H. Chew, MD, MSc

Shock wave lithotripsy has competition. The SOUND trial showed Break Wave lithotripsy is as effective and as safe as shock wave lithotripsy without the need for anesthesia. There were no adverse events in the trial, and 70% of stones were cleared successfully.

“The SOUND trial met its criteria of being noninferior to shock wave lithotripsy,” said Ben H. Chew, MD, MSc, associate professor of urology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. “It was well tolerated with no anesthesia, with the majority of cases being done in the clinic. We had patients who biked into the clinic, were treated successfully, and biked themselves home.”

Shock wave lithotripsy delivers a sharp shock to fragment stone, which can create pain in the surrounding tissue, Dr. Chew said. The Break Wave device uses ultrasound to create a standing wave that fragments the stone. He likened the difference to a boxer delivering a single massive blow to a punching bag versus delivering a timed series of less forceful blows to a speed bag to achieve the same effect.

Break Wave forms a lower pressure, high cycle standing wave that creates a grid of high stress points inside the stone that leads to fragmentation. The pressure inside the stone is 10 times higher than in the surrounding tissue, creating little to no pain or discomfort. Both Break Wave and shock wave lithotripsy shatter stones into fragments and dust that can exit via the ureter. The same Break Wave platform can be used with a different delivery device to move stone fragments into the ureter for clearance.

The trial treated 64 patients at 10 centers across North America with stones >4 mm and <10 mm. Patients were followed for 90 days after a one-week treatment period. The median stone size was 7.8 mm, 6.3 mm for renal stones and 7.3 mm for ureteral stones. Stones had a median hardness of 891 Hounsfield Units, and 29.7% were at the lower pole, with 32.8% at the ureterovesical junction. Most patients (57.8%) had a history of stones.

The median therapy delivery time was 29.7 minutes, with another 14 minutes for discharge. A quarter of patients (27%) required a single retreatment, and none required stents.

The adverse event rate was 0%, with transient hematuria resolving spontaneously at 1.7 days post treatment. Break Wave had a 70% success rate overall, with 98% of all stones showing evidence of fragmentation. Renal stones had a 52% clearance rate, while 87% of ureteral stones cleared.

Lower pole stones had the lowest clearance rate at 47%. A follow-up using a smaller, FDA-cleared probe with a larger acoustic window improved lower pole clearance to 71% and 100% for other stones.

Interesting Stories
Unique formulation of YONSA® (abiraterone acetate) makes it different
Sponsored by Sun Pharma
Unique formulation of YONSA® (abiraterone acetate) makes it different
Book your AUA2026 housing now
Sponsored by AUA
Book your AUA2026 housing now
AUA means business: AUA Annual Business Meeting is May 18
Sponsored by AUA
AUA means business: AUA Annual Business Meeting is May 18
Find your next big break at AUA2026
Sponsored by AUA
Find your next big break at AUA2026
More Content
From left: Kymora Scotland, MD, PhD; Taylor Brewer, MSM, PA; and Greg Tasian, MD, MSc, MSCE.
Meeting Coverage
New stone guidelines sharpen focus on patient-centered care
May 16, 2026
Jaspreet S. Sandhu, MD
Meeting Coverage
Updated BPH guidelines focus on patients, not procedures
May 16, 2026
Jennifer Robles, MD, MPH
Meeting Coverage
Antibiotic use clarified in stone removal guidelines
May 16, 2026
Fda Expert Panel
Meeting Coverage
Advocacy rewrites the label for HRT
May 16, 2026
Sara M. Lenherr, MD, MS, URPS
Meeting Coverage
Reinventing one of urology’s oldest tools
May 16, 2026
H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH
Meeting Coverage
The hidden cost of looking harder for cancer
May 15, 2026
Neal Shore, MD
Meeting Coverage
Durvalumab + BCG continues to deliver in high-risk NMIBC
May 15, 2026
Jean F.P. Lestingi, MD, PhD
Meeting Coverage
Updated trial refines role of extended lymph node dissection
May 15, 2026
Mack Roach III, MD
Meeting Coverage
The expanding role of biomarkers in prostate cancer
May 15, 2026
Hans Arora, MD, PhD
Meeting Coverage
Urology’s many definitions of success
May 15, 2026
Welcome
Meeting Coverage
Welcome to Washington, DC
May 13, 2026
Guidelines
Meeting Coverage
Global experts to compare evolving prostate cancer guidelines at AUA Plenary panel
May 13, 2026
AUA
Twitter X icon Facebook iconInstagram iconYouTube iconLinkedIn icon
© 2026 Ascend Media. All rights reserved.